menu close menu


Community Benefits Agreement Legislation

For developer Ken Weinstein, who mostly works in neighborhoods outside the booming downtown, the legislation seems problematic. It already offers benefits to the neighborhood, he says – things like low-interest loans for emerging developers or donations to community development companies. The contract remains legally binding even if the property is transferred to new owners. The developers also signed separate card verification/neutrality agreements with five unions and agreed to comply with the city`s by-law on worker retention. ”We`ve seen places where there were community benefit agreements with multiple RCOs,” Clarke said. ”We need guidance to ensure that this is done in a way that is acceptable to complaints and that it benefits the host community.” The ”CBAs” of some recent projects have not been accepted by supporters of the Community Benefits movement as legitimate CBAs. For example, for the new Yankee Stadium, the ”CBA” was not considered a ”real” CBA because it was negotiated by elected officials and not by community groups. [10] The agreement had considerable benefits for the Community, such as subsidies of $28,000,000 and free tickets for local organisations. [18] However, the CBA has not been implemented smoothly. In 2009, the former community funder sued the Yankees charity, claiming the fund had been mismanaged. [19] Inclusion. The CBA negotiation process can provide a mechanism to ensure that the Community`s concerns are heard and taken into account. While some cities are doing a good job of finding and responding to the Community`s input, many are not.

Low-income neighborhoods, non-English-speaking areas, and communities of color have historically been excluded from the development process. Laws on publicity and participation are often poorly enforced, and official public hearings often take place at times and places that are not favourable to the neighbourhood. A CBA negotiation process can help address these issues and create a forum for all parts of the relevant community. Community benefits Agreements (CBAs) are complex multi-stakeholder contracts executed by multiple community-based organizations and one or more developers, including the commitment of developers to provide a number of community benefits related to a proposed development project, and typically include the requirement for community-based organizations to support project approval. The community benefits movement began in Los Angeles successfully in mixed-use projects in Hollywood and Highland,[6] and Staples Center/LA Live. [7] Since then, it has rapidly expanded to other cities, including Atlanta, Chicago, Denver, Milwaukee, Minneapolis, New Haven, New York, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, San Diego, San Francisco, San Jose, Seattle, Syracuse, Washington, D.C and Wilmington. [8] Major organizations include the National Community Reinvestment Coalition [2], The Partnership for Working Families [3], los Angeles Alliance for a New Economy (”LAANE”) [4], Strategic Actions for a Just Economy (”SAJE”)[5], SCOPE [6], Georgia Stand-Up [7] and Pittsburg UNITED [8] Community benefits strategy focuses on organizing communities and building coalitions. [11] [12] [13] Organizing and maintaining a coalition, facilitating compromises and developing a common agenda are essential for the establishment of an effective CBA. Coalitions can encompass a large number of community groups, such as neighbourhood groups, environmental organizations, good government organizations, unions, and faith-based organizations. [5] Coalitions are generally not registered, but member community groups may enter into a corporate agreement to settle their relations within the coalition. A CBA Coalition Operating Agreement model was established by the Public Law Center at Tulane Law School. [14] The movement for services of general interest is based on the premise that economic development should bring significant improvements to local residents, especially in low-income neighbourhoods.

. . .


Comments are closed.